View Message

Sort of dislike Savannah, but Siena is very nice. ;)

I once read a book (chick-lit, so the parents were the well off middle-class, London-dwelling trendy sort, nannies, 4x4s and ladies-who-lunch etc) and two sisters in it were Siena and Savannah. So they've always stuck in my mind as that sort of name, Southern England, goes to school with Ruperts, Cosmos, Florences, Opals, Saffrons and fit in well with celebrity names (and probably anything on my list :) ) (DISCLAIMER: Not saying these are bad names)

---

They're ok but I've never warmed to them, Siena because of Sienna Miller, she annoys me. (and, funnily enough, has a sister called Savannah).

---

I really strongly dislike both names, and together they are cutesy and trendy. :(

I like the names seperately, but I wouldn't use them as twin names.

I agree with Erin, both seem quite trendy. Plus I just can't get used to Siena as a name, it's an Italian city!

I like both names, but would never use them for twins, because they both start with the same letter. I'd be afraid I'd get confused using the same letter for twins. I'd try to use a different letter for both. I might use something that had like a theme to it, but not starting with the same letter. Like, for instance, if I had a daughter named Susanna / Susannah, I might use Rose, Lily, or Iris for the second one, just because it might be cute. Or, maybe something completely different with no relation what so ever. Like Susannah and Claire.

This message was edited 5/22/2007, 8:07 AM

pretty trendy I think