View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Re: Easter
But Eostre was the name of a goddess, even at that--the word as a word may not have a religious meaning, but it certainly did at one point. Which makes it doubly weird to use as a personal name honoring a different religion--and, as has been noted, mileage may vary on any explicitly religious name.Word-names tend to veer toward the cheesy anyway, in my opinion, and your friend would probably do better with Agnes, Lily, Rachel, or Pascale. Even April would be a marginally better name, and that's the month in which Easter falls next year.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Hehee.So was Diana the name of a goddess, and Bridget and Chloe and Rhiannon and Irene and Tanith and Freya and Vesta refer to goddesses too.. So "having a religious meaning at one point" does not really make a name honor the religion it derived from. That's a bit silly, isn't it? The problem was that Easter refers to a Christian holiday - albeit one coopted from paganism - it's immediately perceived as Christian now, so the name Easter would be superficially perceived as "honoring" Christianity. I guess that's all that matters, though.- chazda the pedantic
vote up1