[Opinions] I'm from Western Canada
in reply to a message by Christa S.
And, as I said before, I have heard of female Tristans, but that's more like when someone names their daughter Michael. Plain male name, being put on a girl. Which I don't mind. It's just that to me, there's no ambiguity to the name Tristan (or Michael for that matter.) It's strictly male. The way it sounds, its history (Tristan and Isolde being a good example of the name being used on a male in the past), everything.
Edit: I like not to spell "strictly" correctly the first time...
Edit: I like not to spell "strictly" correctly the first time...
This message was edited 4/29/2008, 11:36 PM