New Post
Search
Help[Opinions] Right...........
in reply to a message by Algernon
please crawl back into whatever hole you came from. But thanks for replying to my post.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
It was a simple request, and yet it seems the subtlety of punctuation eludes you yet. It would appear that you are well and truly a lost cause. It's good to know you are unable to substantiate or quantify any of your claims, and likely unable to hold a coherent thought in your feeble mind. How wonderful that we didn't have to resort to pettiness to clarify your worthlessness as individual to you.
1
You do realize that you haven't substantiated your claims, either, don't you? You did not formally cite any sources ("Boston University proved this" and "the FBI found that" don't cut it) and as such it cannot be determined if your assertions are valid. Furthermore, you explicitly dismiss those who disagree with you on the basis of an alleged "inability" to use caps lock, quotation marks, and punctuation. I find this particularly amusing as your own sentences are meandering, your comma use is inconsistent, and your grammar is imperfect.
This message was edited 2/15/2010, 7:23 PM
1
Sources:
1. The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr.- - (an official publication of the Martin Luther King Center for Nonviolent Social Change).
2. "King's Plagiarism: Imitation, Insecurity and Transformation," The Journal of American History, June 1991, p. 87) David J. Garrow
3. New York Times" of October 11, 1991, page 15.
4. "The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr.", David J. Garrow, (1981).
5. "And the walls came tumbling down," Rev. Ralph Abernathy (1989)
Substantial enough?
1. The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr.- - (an official publication of the Martin Luther King Center for Nonviolent Social Change).
2. "King's Plagiarism: Imitation, Insecurity and Transformation," The Journal of American History, June 1991, p. 87) David J. Garrow
3. New York Times" of October 11, 1991, page 15.
4. "The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr.", David J. Garrow, (1981).
5. "And the walls came tumbling down," Rev. Ralph Abernathy (1989)
Substantial enough?
1
I don't question some of your facts. Those things that are facts, and not opinion or supposition. What I deny is the significance of your facts.
I was hoping someday to have a granddaughter. I've changed my mind. I hope to have a third grandson, and his middle name will be Luther. After you know who. Thanks for convincing me!
I was hoping someday to have a granddaughter. I've changed my mind. I hope to have a third grandson, and his middle name will be Luther. After you know who. Thanks for convincing me!
1
I love that you have this information at your fingertips. Do you troll forums hoping to get into Martin Luther King Jr. fights?
PS: what are your favourite names?
PS: what are your favourite names?
1
It took less than ten seconds to find. Anything will do on a Monday afternoon. This has been very amusing.
Top 5?
Male:
Algernon,
Damocles,
Orpheo,
Lorenzo,
St. John,
Female:
Ophelia,
Nova,
Vera,
Persephone,
Isidora
Top 5?
Male:
Algernon,
Damocles,
Orpheo,
Lorenzo,
St. John,
Female:
Ophelia,
Nova,
Vera,
Persephone,
Isidora
1
I don't like any of your male names. Algernon in particular is ridiculous, effete, and pretentious. St. John is quite pretentious.
I like Ophelia, Vera, and Persephone. I can't get behind the IZ sound in Isadora, though. Nova is awful.
I like Ophelia, Vera, and Persephone. I can't get behind the IZ sound in Isadora, though. Nova is awful.
1
Please
refrain from personal attacks, which are otherwise known as "flaming." Check the board rules - you have broken them.
refrain from personal attacks, which are otherwise known as "flaming." Check the board rules - you have broken them.
1
Congratulations sir, you have caught me in the act. My apologies for being such an impolite troll. Your forum is truly a hilarious place to inflame, I will be sure to recommend it to my friends in the future. Thank you for your vigilance. Is there any form of atonement you would appreciate or should I simply delete my account?
1
I guess it's up to mirfak to say, but personally, I'd vote for deleting your account.
1
oh oops
1
you're an idiot
1
Well,
I'd prefer some form of actual refutation instead of childish namecalling, but I no longer expect any form of logic from this forum. If you truly cannot say anything, do not waste your time being so presumptuous.
I'd prefer some form of actual refutation instead of childish namecalling, but I no longer expect any form of logic from this forum. If you truly cannot say anything, do not waste your time being so presumptuous.
1
A true mark of one who knows his or her arguments are feeble, hateful, and prejudicial, is that this one will immediately, upon meeting with any resistance whatsoever to their Neanderthal views, resort to petty and personal insults.
Oh, and I haven't misused capitals. I have USED them for EMPHASIS. Nor have I failed to use punctuation. Thanks for your attention to this matter.
Oh, and I haven't misused capitals. I have USED them for EMPHASIS. Nor have I failed to use punctuation. Thanks for your attention to this matter.
1
Irony at its finest
Ah, me, what has the world come to when every fool's insults are so idiotically self-referential. Does the phrase "conditional clause" mean nothing to you? The way you attack foreign opinions is utterly shameful, you should be mortified by your hypocrisy. I resent being stereotyped as just another troll who is hateful and prejudiced as you, I was merely presenting truths you have not seen fit to refute with logic. The fact of the matter remains that you have neither the means nor the will to substantiate your own beliefs in such matters and likely subsist on the same informational refuse as you always have, and always will. I see no further point in attempting to correct your ways. On this note, I will leave you to your fabrications.
Ah, me, what has the world come to when every fool's insults are so idiotically self-referential. Does the phrase "conditional clause" mean nothing to you? The way you attack foreign opinions is utterly shameful, you should be mortified by your hypocrisy. I resent being stereotyped as just another troll who is hateful and prejudiced as you, I was merely presenting truths you have not seen fit to refute with logic. The fact of the matter remains that you have neither the means nor the will to substantiate your own beliefs in such matters and likely subsist on the same informational refuse as you always have, and always will. I see no further point in attempting to correct your ways. On this note, I will leave you to your fabrications.
1
1. I have the will and I have the means. I am choosing not to employ them at this time, because I don't consider the opinions section of a names site the appropriate place to do so. When I made my initial response to you, I did not at all expect the type of response that you saw fit to make. I didn't want to really debate the issue here, again, because I don't consider it the appropriate place. Neither did I wish for you to think that I concurred in your opinion, however. That's why I have responded the way that I have. Namely, I have let you know that I consider your opinion disgraceful, without going into the details of why I do.
2. You have attacked my opinion, which is as foreign to you as yours is to me, to a greater degree than I have attacked yours.
3. You have no cause to call me a hypocrite, just as you have none to call me hateful and prejudiced.
4. I have fabricated nothing.
2. You have attacked my opinion, which is as foreign to you as yours is to me, to a greater degree than I have attacked yours.
3. You have no cause to call me a hypocrite, just as you have none to call me hateful and prejudiced.
4. I have fabricated nothing.
1