View Message

[Opinions] Lalita
I like Lolita because it has a lovely sound, but I guess it just isn't an easy name to live with. So I looked for alternatives and found Lalita which I like even better. I pronounce it more like LAH-lee-ta, does anyone know whether this is correct? Would it be weird to use if you didn't have the background? Still too close to Lolita?
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

I would pronounce it the same as you. It is soooo much better than Lolita. Amazing how one letter can change a name.
It has a flirty, feminine, Hispanic feel.
vote up1
I picture an Indian/ Hindu girl when I hear Lalita, but like someone else said, Chandra is a Hindu name and I also know two white Chandras. It might be confused, but little kids wouldn't know about Nabakov's novel.
vote up1
I was very surprised to see that this name is Indian in origin. I just finished the book "Cane River," by Lalita Tademy. It is the story of her African-American and Creole ancestors. Hmmm. Maybe her parents just liked the sound of Lalita.I suppose it could be mistaken for Lolita, although I hadn't even thought of that when I encountered it in the author's name.
vote up1
Oh, I do think Lalita is very sweet! Yay, I've been looking for things that Lally could be a nn for besides Lalage, which I'm not entirely content with. Hmm.I do think Lalita would be confused for Lolita a lot. I don't think it would be all that weird if you weren't Indian or Hindi because the look and sound can fit in English just fine. Plus the only Chandras I've ever known were caucasian, and it worked okay. I was surprised when I learned it was an Indian name!
vote up1
I think it's too similar to Lolita, sorry. Maybe Lola? Or Charlotta, which has a similar ending to it.
vote up1
I think it's still too close. Possibly usable as a mn.Also kinda reminds me of the Teletubby Lala.S xx
vote up1