View Message

[Opinions] Connor (F)
This has officially been accepted as a unisex on Nameberry and I just want to know, what do you guys think of Connor on a girl? Personally I think it’s borderline horrible on a girl noting I know a guy named Connor Blake, but to each their own."People say nothing is impossible, but I do nothing all day."'*•.¸♡ Have a great day/night! ♡¸.•*' Rate my personal name list please :) https://www.behindthename.com/pnl/217493
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

I know of oneA workmate of mine has a sister named Connor (not sure of the spelling though) who would probably be in her late 20s. It always throws me when she mentions Connor and I have to imagine a woman in my head. I like it on a boy but I just can't get behind Connor on a girl.
vote up1
I dislike it on a boy and think it’s horrible on a girl. There’s nothing even remotely feminine about it.
vote up1
Borderline horrible? You are too polite and generous. Anyone who really, really craves the name for a girl should think very hard about Constance instead.
vote up1
I don't think it works, but I could maybe see Conner as unisex.
For accents without rhotic r, Connor-on-a-girl could be Conna or something?
vote up1
Terrible
vote up1
I once met a woman named Connor. Honestly, a real life bearer didn't make the name seem any more feminine to me. It sounds strictly masculine, and I don't know why parents feel the need to do this to their daughters.
vote up1
There are some boy names I love for girls, like Kai or Hunter, but I just can’t picture Connor on a girl. It should stay in the boy’s lane only.Then again, I could’ve never imagined Mandy for a boy, but there’s Mandy Patinkin, and he somehow makes it work for him. Although, it’s just a nickname as his full name is Mandel, but still.

This message was edited 5/23/2021, 4:11 PM

vote up1
no no no no no no no no no no no no... no... just no. Ugh.
vote up1
This makes me sad. I love it on boys. But once a traditionally masculine name becomes accepted as unisex, before long, it's lost to the boys altogether.
vote up1
Unisex means it's NOT lost to the boys at all though. It's only lost to the boys if it becomes feminine, but even then you can name your son whatever you want even if it's more common for girls.
vote up1
This has gone down in Naming History many times though. Ashley, Addison, Madison, Leslie, the list can go on. Now today most people probably can’t even imagine those names on a male. (Probably more so America than others) there’s nothing wrong with unisex names but just saying.
vote up1
Unisex SHOULD mean it's usable for both. It almost never works that way in the end. Ashley was considered male originally. Then unisex for a brief moment. And finally, exclusively female. Now, if you suggested naming a boy Ashley, you'd get all kinds of blowback from people saying it's feminine. It's the typical pattern.
vote up1
Unisex for a time before it goes totally to the girls side...
vote up1
I agree 100%
vote up1
I don't like this name at all, sorry. The sound is just not appealing.

This message was edited 5/23/2021, 3:54 PM

vote up1