View Message

I like it.

Nice

I think it's very, very beautiful. I don't care that it was 2000s trendy which isn't a bad thing anyways in my mind.

It's okay. Very 80s, early 90s. I like the sound of Jennifer much better. But Jenna has one advantage: people are less likely to shorten it to Jen or Jenny.

---

It's okay, not bad, and not hopelessly dated but it does sound a bit dated.

Ugly

---

Jennifer is much better.

Dated

---

It feels pretty dated to me. Otherwise it's fine.

I find it very boring, and much less attractive to my eyes and ears than Jenny. I also grew up with several Jenna's and just don't care for it.

I like it a lot. It's less placeholder than Jenny (which I do like) and much less tired and annoying than Jennifer.

Love it

It's okay. However the Jenna's that I personally met, did not like me. I have to pass on this name, unfortunately.

Can't see the point of it. Take Jenny, the classic nn for Jennifer and, in the past, for Jane, and then add an -a ... to do what? Feminise it? Hardly necessary. Make it into a full name rather than a nn? What's the attraction - the sound? The look? It seems dated where I live, so perhaps it was a short-lived fad.