View Message

Some of these, especially among the great-granddaughters, are unexpectedly modern. I (vaguely) remember when Savannah was born people were surprised by the name - and looking up the kids, Isla (very trendy) is her younger sister. Not a fan of Isla at all, but I do like Savannah quite a bit, and prefer it to the similar, more traditional Susannah (though I much prefer the no-H spelling, Savanna).

---

Charlotte is lovely but, at this point, overused as a first name, so I could never use it myself in that capacity. (Felicity Charlotte is a stock combo for me, though sometimes I fret that Charlotte looks "filler" even there.) Sienna I like, and initially I thought she was Savannah's sister since it's the same vibe. Mia and Lena don't feel like full names to me, and Lilibet just doesn't look or sound like a real name at all. Sorry.

---

Setting my personal, intense dislike of the entire family of "George names" aside (the repetitious "dzh" sound grinds my gears), it's not an objectionable name on its own, and honestly expected as an heir to the crown. I like Lucas (though I prefer Luke), and Louis is a good name even though it's strikingly French for the English royal family. Never did care for August (even though it's my birth month), and I just cannot hop on the Archie bandwagon.

---

***

---

Please rate my personal name lists:

---

www.behindthename.com/pnl/69381
www.behindthename.com/pnl/69381/117507
www.behindthename.com/pnl/69381/109399
www.behindthename.com/pnl/69381/132018