View Message

I think both of these names are very pretty.

They both feel dated to me. I'd expect to see them on middle-aged women. I'm not a fan of either one.

Sharon is in need of a very long rest. I really don’t like Sheila.

I actually kind of like Sharon. It's sturdy and secretly romantic.

---

Sheila is a bit goofy to me.

I really like Sharon, it feels strong, but it's maybe too dated (I would love it to become popular nowadays, though).
Sheila is ok, I don't really care for it.

Sharon is tired and forgettable. I like it more as a surname.

---

Sheila is pretty, unassuming. As long as it's not spelt Shelagh or Sheelagh!

I don’t think quite enough time has passed for these names to come around again. They still sound dated, both the specific names and the sounds within them.

I like them both, but I think I like Sharon more. They both sounds classic. Sharon radiates the floral energy and Sheila has the ocean-y vibes to me.

I have a fondness for Sharon, it's soft yet firm. Sounds like the name of someone dependable.

---

Sheila I read in an Aussie accent and I can't take seriously lol

So dated…I actually prefer Sharon, I have a very lovely family member with this name. She goes by Sherry.

Sharon seems very dated; I'd be surprised to meet a young one. I rather like the gentle quietness of Sheila.

Don't like either

Sharon has a very strange sound to me and I don’t like it. Makes me think of the receptionist Sharon who hated me in middle school. Imo Sharon is also in its ✨mom name era✨. I’d be surprised to see a kid or teen with this name. I prefer Karen.

---

Sheila sounds a bit better to me, I like it more than Sharon, but still not a fan. Sheila seems like it’s in its ✨mom name era✨too but I could still see this on a younger person.