[Opinions] Re: Is "cull" the same as "kill"?
in reply to a message by Ylva
A "cull" is a planned animal kill aimed at reducing the numbers of an animal that has become so over-populated that it is causing a nuisance.
~Chrisell~
Proudly Australian
www.archaeochrisell.blogspot.com
Proudly Australian
www.archaeochrisell.blogspot.com
Replies
I never heard anything more terrible in my life. Killing innocent animals because WE think there are too many. That's sick.
Um . . .
We think there are too many because they don't have enough food for their numbers, so the ones that miss out on the available normal prey attack and sometimes kill small children because they're hungry. Would you prefer us to feed them children than cull them?
Culls of other animals have also occurred where the animals had insufficient resources. If you've got 10,000 kangaroos and you *know* 4,000 of them are going to starve to death, it's a pretty horrible sight to just let them starve. Better to humanely cull them than wait for them to die.
~Chrisell~
Proudly Australian
www.archaeochrisell.blogspot.com
We think there are too many because they don't have enough food for their numbers, so the ones that miss out on the available normal prey attack and sometimes kill small children because they're hungry. Would you prefer us to feed them children than cull them?
Culls of other animals have also occurred where the animals had insufficient resources. If you've got 10,000 kangaroos and you *know* 4,000 of them are going to starve to death, it's a pretty horrible sight to just let them starve. Better to humanely cull them than wait for them to die.
Proudly Australian
www.archaeochrisell.blogspot.com
This message was edited 10/29/2006, 2:25 PM
why WE would think that
There are also animals that are brought by humans to a foreign country (like Australia when the first settlers came), they ran out in the wild and the problem was that they didn't have natural enemies, so they disrupted the balance in the ecosystem. Then these animals were controlled by humans by killing them when they become to numerous. Then it becomes a matterof people cleaning up their own mess. Personally, I don't like it (I'd prefer sterilisation of some other measures).
There are also animals that are brought by humans to a foreign country (like Australia when the first settlers came), they ran out in the wild and the problem was that they didn't have natural enemies, so they disrupted the balance in the ecosystem. Then these animals were controlled by humans by killing them when they become to numerous. Then it becomes a matterof people cleaning up their own mess. Personally, I don't like it (I'd prefer sterilisation of some other measures).
This message was edited 10/29/2006, 8:31 AM
Thank you. Though whether there is an overpopulation and nuisance or not, is obvious sometimes controversial.
- She said he made a racial slur!
- Racial? She is Swedish!
- Maybe he called her Meatball.
Equality never goes out of style.
- She said he made a racial slur!
- Racial? She is Swedish!
- Maybe he called her Meatball.
Equality never goes out of style.