View Message

[Opinions] Opinions on Chrysanthemum?
My DH suggested this today. Chrysanthemum, calling her Anna.Way too out there?
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Yes it is. I hate it. Maybe Cynthia.
vote up1
I think it would be cumbersome, even with Anna and Chrys as nickname possibilities. It also has a very distinctly "frilly" feel to it, which could be a problem if your daughter turned out to be a tomboy. (That's part of the reason why, as much as I love them, Magnolia and Lavender are probably going to remain guilty pleasures for me... although I don't think either one is quite as unwieldy as Chrysanthemum; however, that could just be my bias.)
vote up1
LavenderBut if Lavender turned out to be a tomboy, she could call herself Lava: The Destroyer of Worlds.Or...not. :D
vote up1
While I think it's pretty, I think it's way too much for a little kid to handle. I would use it as a nickname, ie, "There you are, my little chrysanthemum!" and think of something simpler for her actual name. It's hard when a little kid has to learn to write their name. And what if she has a reading disability? It will be even harder. Add to that the complete frustration she'll have when filling out her name on standardized tests, going up and down to fill in the bubbles. You could even make it her middle name, if you really love it, because all she'll ever be required to write is her initial.
vote up1
I think it's utterly gorgeous - but then again I do have a thing for very eccentric flower names. I think the name Chrysanthemum has the same delicacy and sweetness almost any other flower name has, but it's also very elegant and original because it's so unusual.
vote up1
I feel that it is too long and unusual to use. May I suggest Chrysantha? It's one of my favorites and sounds very similar. :)
vote up1
If DH wants to call her Anna then why bother lumbering her with a name like Chrysanthemum, dont get me wrong I rather like long names and as names go this isnt too bad just a bit heavy sounding, but Anna as a nickname is stretching it a bit, I suspect she would end up as Chris / Chrys

This message was edited 1/8/2007, 4:27 AM

vote up1
I think it is too much (and I usually like flower names) and the nn Anna isn't natural to me as the Anna sound isn't really there (at least how I pronounce it - krih-SANTH-ah-mum, you see the -an- is included with the SANTH)
vote up1
I'd have to saythat yeah, I do think it's kind of out there. :-) It's just a bit much for me and to boot I don't care for using Anna as a nickname. It's too far off for me, plus it's so 'proper' or whatever a name that it doesn't even seem remotely nicknamey. I'd rather go with another Chr* name that's not quite as over the top-- Christine, Chrysanthe, Christophine, whatever else--or since your DH seems to like it, just Anna.
vote up1
Fine, but I'd call her Chrys, and I suspect others would too
vote up1
I prefer Chrysanthe.
vote up1
I love it, I don't see why not it's just a flower name like the others
vote up1
Logicseems to be lacking from your reasoning, though.Just because something fits into a category from which names have sometimes been drawn doesn't mean that anything in the category would work.Let's apply your "but it's a flower so it should be usable" reasoning to this list of flower names from the Flowers and Plants Association of the UK's website:
Broom
Bottlebrush
Cockscomb
Drumstick
ScabiousOr from a flower company called 800flowers:
Leptospernum
Tritoma
Rattlesnake Calathium
RanunculusAnyway, my point is that just because some common flower names also make good names does not mean that any flower name can be a manageable human name.

This message was edited 1/8/2007, 4:22 AM

vote up1
MercyAs in, oh my good gracious heavens.I don't think Sabrina's very mild comment warranted being pounded with your logic, Cora. She did not say what you "said" she did; you used quotation marks to paraphrase her - taking misleading linguistic liberties with your argument, imo; tsk tsk.She didn't say all or any or always or must or even should, which you "quoted." She was plainly talking about the single name at hand. It is just a flower name, for cryin out loud, and she has every right to merely say so.Just as you have every right to disagree with her, of course.And I with you.
Ahh, human discourse...
vote up1
I meant it in the finger quote sense; it was late, so I guess I could have formatted that better, but it is fairly obvious that she didn't say those exact words, and people use quote marks in this sort of context all the time. Anyway, I don't quote her as saying "all" or "any;" those were my words for the point I was making. As for "should," that is essentially what she said if you follow A from B. Her A is that it is a flower name, and her B is that other flower names are usable. She could have meant "could" or "might" or "possibly usable" instead of "should be usable," sure, but the "I don't see why not" she used at the beginning indicates that she approves of the name; therefore, "should be usable" is an OK paraphrase as far as intention goes.Again, I'm sorry that the quotation marks were misleading to you. It's hard to do finger quotes on the computer so I substitued real quotes and assumed that the context would speak for itself. I've learned my lesson.

This message was edited 1/8/2007, 2:09 PM

vote up1
I agree.By that logic, I guess I can name my kids...Virginity, because other virtue names are okay.
Kudzu and Poison Ivy, because other botanical names are acceptable.
Bloodstone, because other gemstone names are acceptable.
Alcatraz, because it's a place name and we use those all the time.
McGillicuddy, because, hey, it's just another surname!
And finally, I can name my daughter Butch Albert because if Ryan and Taylor can be used on girls, why not those too?Now THERE'S a snazzy sibset. ;)

This message was edited 1/8/2007, 8:50 AM

vote up1
Leptsospernum! I've got a new favourite name!
vote up1
ummRanunculus has a nice ring to it lol
vote up1
Hey! I naemd my daugther Cockscomb!and her brother Ranunculus is crying the the corner now! I hope you're happy with yourself . . .
vote up1
But there's a big difference between shouting "Lily!" and "Chrysanthemum!" in a supermarket. The latter is a serious mouthful!

This message was edited 1/8/2007, 2:29 AM

vote up1
nevermind

This message was edited 1/8/2007, 10:18 AM

vote up1
So is AlexandrinaSo what? I don't think that matters so much really.
vote up1
That's true - and Alexandrina is on my favourites list. But the difference, for me, is that I can say Alexandrina, even quickly and with my mouth full of mashed potato. I can't say Chrysanthemum at the best of times - I always put an N in by mistake: ChrystantheNum :-/
vote up1
When I was young, I was going to name my first girl Chrysanthemum Alethea, and everyone made fun of me...I never shared my name oppinions after that, but I personally think it's beautiful.
vote up1
I suppose I don't mind it... actually quite like like it. It is very long thought, but Hey! that doesn't matter. Anna is a HUGE stretch though. I reckon people will probably call her Chrysie. Well, I would.
What about Amarantha, Amaryllis, Azalea, Jasmine, Juniper, Marigold, Peony, Rosemary, or Zinnia??
They are all flower names as well. (Hey, I just realised... Lot's of them have the NN Mary.)
Well, What do you think?
vote up1
I like it a lot, it is very pretty. I like the nn Anna. I really like long unexpected names with the nn Anna (which I find boring on its own). My favourite is Andromeda nn Anna
vote up1
I prefer Chrysanthe just by itself, love it.
vote up1
I'll add my voice-too long for a little child, too ditzy for an adult.
vote up1
I like it in theory but I don't think I would use it personally. I think Ann or Annie is a more realistic nn than Anna although the most obvious nn to me is Chrys/Chris. Why not just name her Anna?

This message was edited 1/7/2007, 8:13 PM

vote up1
Too much.And what's the point if you just call her Anna?
vote up1
What about Anna Chrysanthemum? I do think Chrysanthemum is a little too long and complicated for a fn.
vote up1
It always reminds me of the book Chrysanthemum, which was one of my favorite books as a kid. I can't remember who it's by, but it's about a little mouse named Chrysanthemum who loves her name until she goes to school and the other kids tease her because it's unusual. In the end, though, she learns to love it again. I think it's sweet. I probably wouldn't use it myself, but I'd smile if I were to meet a Chrysanthemum. Anna is a fine nickname for it if she needs something a little easier to go by on a regular basis.
vote up1
Being a dyslexic person I can tell you it's really difficult to read for me, spelling it would be even harder. So therefore a 'no' for me. You could also call her Anthem :) or Mum come to think of it... I think Anna is sort stretching, so if you must, I'd go with nn Chrys / Santhe
vote up1
I could by it, but nms. Chrysantheum would be better. Anna doesn't work as nn. How about Chris or Thea?
vote up1
It's a bit unwieldy, and most people will assume Chrys as a NN, I imagine. I love Anna, but I think there are better full names for it, or just use it on its own.
vote up1
It's a little long. But Anna is nice. =)Amanda
Current Top Favorites
Elise ▪ Kate ▪ Winnie
Ephraim ▪ Thaddeus ▪ Wyatt
vote up1