[Opinions] Re: While we're on the subject of twins
Nan and Nay (girls)
Um... no, I don;t like these. They're very strange.Kathy and Shelly
Not too horrible, I don't like Shelly though.Cathe and Cande (e has a y sound)
No! That's just bad! Candy is bad enough. Cathy is OK, but with those spellings that's awful!Patrick and Gerard
I like Patrick, but not Gerard.Orval and Orvetta
Um... are they a boy and a girl? I think they're too similar and not my taste at all.Donald and Marianne
I don't really like Donald (I always think of Old MacDonald, but not MacDonald's, which is kind of weird.) Marianne is nice.Karen and Kenneth
Not bad.Solomon Jr and Cicily (Sonny and Cissy)
I think the JR part is very American and Soloman sounds too Biblish to me, but it would be OK for someone very Christian. I have a friend called Cicely and I prefer that spelling, but it's a nice name.Wayland and Wyatt (my cousins babies)
Sorry, I hate both of those names. Especially Wyatt.Robin and Ronald (Rob and Ron)
I like Robin, especially Robyn for a girl. Ronald I don't really like.Garrett and Klausine (boy and girl)
No, not my taste. Klausine just sounds way too made-up for me (don't know if it is or not). I do quite like Claudine though, which is similar. Garrett makes me think of Lesley Garrett, a famous opera singer.Crissy and Carrie
Chrissie I don't mind, if it's short for Christina or something, but I hate that spelling. Carrie I don't mind, but I don't love it.John and Thomas (Johnny and Tommy)
OK, very common names but there's nothing wrong with them.They're my opinions. Sorry for being so negative!
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Messages

While we're on the subject of twins  ·  flavie  ·  12/23/2004, 6:22 AM
Re: While we're on the subject of twins  ·  Tallie  ·  12/23/2004, 3:22 PM
Re: While we're on the subject of twins  ·  Lissa Hannah  ·  12/23/2004, 9:47 AM
Re: While we're on the subject of twins  ·  Ane  ·  12/23/2004, 6:36 AM