Message: "Re: out of curiosity"

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Re: out of curiosity

by -=A=- (Avgvst)

5/3/2008, 10:13 PM

in reply to a message by Tippins

Ironically no. It has been varied enough in my opinion away from the original.

Replies

- Tippins (blaaarg) +2

5/3/2008, 10:15 PM

Well, Joshua and Jesus are both variant transcriptions of Yeshua. Would you say Jesus has been varied enough from the original to be usable?

- -=A=- (Avgvst) +1

5/3/2008, 10:16 PM

No because it is the term I use to refer to the Christ where Joshua is not. They say Yeshua is the closest we can come to the original name, so that would also be too sacred for use.

This message was edited 5/3/2008, 10:20 PM

- EgYpTiAn PrInCeSs

5/4/2008, 1:46 AM

I agree with you

View Message

Replies