Message: "It's so interesting that variants were common even back then (m)"

[Opinions] It's so interesting that variants were common even back then (m)

by LoQuiero

3/30/2009, 3:11 PM

- and sometimes even more popular than today. I think it's got a lot to do with the fact that there wasn't a universal orthography back then, as can also be seen in many poems and other stories from these periods.

Messages

Common Female English names 1450-1650 (and their kr8tyve spellings!) · Hufflepuffer · 3/29/2009, 11:14 PM

•Re: Common Female English names 1450-1650 (and their kr8tyve spellings!) · number1212 · 3/30/2009, 3:54 PM

•It's so interesting that variants were common even back then (m) · LoQuiero · 3/30/2009, 3:11 PM

•Re: Common Female English names 1450-1650 (and their kr8tyve spellings!) · Kokoro · 3/30/2009, 2:02 PM

•Emmet was a female name? · Mackadal · 3/30/2009, 6:23 AM

•Apparently... · Hufflepuffer · 3/30/2009, 2:44 PM

•Re: Common Female English names 1450-1650 (and their kr8tyve spellings!) · Llewella · 3/30/2009, 4:50 AM

•Re: Common Female English names 1450-1650 (and their kr8tyve spellings!) · Jonquil · 3/30/2009, 3:09 AM

•Re: Common Female English names 1450-1650 (and their kr8tyve spellings!) · Chrysanthemum · 3/29/2009, 11:48 PM

View Message

Messages