[Opinions] Re: Oak
in reply to a message by foxgloves
god I forgot all about Tyler Oakley too. yeah that knocks the name down a few pegs for me.
I actually like a decent amount of trendy surname names (Oakley, Hadley) but I know they will become mega-dated in the future and I look at the way people talk about mega-dated names now and I'm like... nah. Not doing that to a real child.
http://www.behindthename.com/pnl/87410
I actually like a decent amount of trendy surname names (Oakley, Hadley) but I know they will become mega-dated in the future and I look at the way people talk about mega-dated names now and I'm like... nah. Not doing that to a real child.
http://www.behindthename.com/pnl/87410
Replies
oh i thought you were referring specifically to him in the bit about Oakley being trendy. i haven't heard Oakley used otherwise tbh.
and yea same about surnames. won't stick. beyond that, it just sounds off to me? especially since in the country i currently live, surnames are always said before first names, unless it's foreign. not that it'd create a complication- again, doesn't apply to foreign names- but for me, it's been weird to flip back and forth, so it makes surname name stand out more as odd. they also tend to feel more..impersonal, if it's a very recognizable surname. the ones i do like are more common as first names, like Wesley and Harper.
and yea same about surnames. won't stick. beyond that, it just sounds off to me? especially since in the country i currently live, surnames are always said before first names, unless it's foreign. not that it'd create a complication- again, doesn't apply to foreign names- but for me, it's been weird to flip back and forth, so it makes surname name stand out more as odd. they also tend to feel more..impersonal, if it's a very recognizable surname. the ones i do like are more common as first names, like Wesley and Harper.