View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Re: that kind of begs the question ...
Sometimes it’s nice to buffer your opinions, and realise that they’re not universal and as a result they can offend people if you’re too blunt.

Jagoda
Top 25: https://www.behindthename.com/pnl/136993/97278

This message was edited 4/10/2018, 1:31 PM

Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

I can't speak for anyone else, but I wanted to make the point to Rox, that buffering other people's feelings is *not* what I'm doing if I say a name is decent but I hate it. The words "I think" are the acknowledgement that my opinion is just one opinion. "but it's a fine name" is only meant to distinguish my aesthetic response from my opinion of the name as a name.Rox's analogy to pears is no good, because an emotional reaction to pears won't imply judgment of whether pears are edible food. That'd be over the top. It's like if I say the Kia Soul is an eyesore, that doesn't imply I think it's not adequate as a car. Of course it's fine as a car, and of course canned pears are food.But if I say Braelyn is ugly, that does imply I think it's bad *as a name.* Because we talk about names here as if one of their functions is to make a subjective impression.I know I'm taking it too far apart - but I got an impression that Rox was wondering if it's some kind of weasel words to avoid offending people, and I wanted to say it isn't.
vote up1
Sure, sure, but I think it’s kind of nice not to offend people. Opinions don’t need to be stated in a blunt, dogmatic (not quite the right word there) way for them to be valid.

This message was edited 4/10/2018, 2:10 PM

vote up1