New Post
Search
Help[Opinions] Re: A clarification:
in reply to a message by Wordsmith
I guess sometimes it’s difficult to separate the two entirely? Even from a purely aesthetic perspective, my appreciation of Ulyana is marred by the fact it’s so close to Juliana?
"We have met the enemy and he is us" Walt Kelly
"We have met the enemy and he is us" Walt Kelly
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
I don't have a problem just thinking about the aesthetics of a name in and of themselves without much regard to IRL usage. Especially when it's a name like this where it's just a language-specific transcription (is that the right word? idk) of a familiar name.
I can appreciate a lot of names that I sort of don't actually "like"... ugly names like Greer and Sloane, they're totally ugly imo... but somehow still pleasing to me lol.
I can appreciate a lot of names that I sort of don't actually "like"... ugly names like Greer and Sloane, they're totally ugly imo... but somehow still pleasing to me lol.
1
I get that, and there are names I like but wouldn’t use on a child, but still when I evaluate a name I *personally* can’t help but think how it would work on a real person.
1
Agree
1