Message: "Re: Question about the nature namesakes on behindthename.com"

[Facts] Re: Question about the nature namesakes on behindthename.com

by Mike C

6/15/2001, 7:21 PM

Excellent idea Selwyn! That would be a perfect addition to the namesakes.

Could you do the format:

NAME + tab + GENDER + tab + PLAY + tab + INFO
NAME is the name of the character
GENDER is either m or f
PLAY is the name of the play the character was featured in. If the same character name is used in more than one play then please put them on separate lines.
INFO is for miscellaneous information you might want to add. In most (or all) cases this can be blank

Thanks Selwyn. Anyone else who wants to contribute, let me know.

Messages

Question about the nature namesakes on behindthename.com · Selwyn · 6/15/2001, 6:46 PM

•Re: Question about the nature namesakes on behindthename.com · Mike C · 6/15/2001, 7:21 PM

•Shakespeare's "Logical Names for Twins"? · Nanaea · 6/16/2001, 5:40 AM

•Interesting (nt) · Selwyn · 6/16/2001, 7:16 AM

•Great! · Selwyn · 6/15/2001, 7:33 PM

•Re: Great! · Phyllis · 6/15/2001, 9:15 PM

•Oops! · Phyllis · 6/15/2001, 9:17 PM

•Not at all how about this (txt) · Selwyn · 6/16/2001, 7:31 AM

•Re: Not at all how about this (txt) · Phyllis · 6/20/2001, 12:08 AM

•The Two Gentlemen of Verona · Selwyn · 6/16/2001, 7:40 AM

•Continued · Selwyn · 6/16/2001, 9:28 AM

•Hey Selwyn! · Phyllis · 6/21/2001, 11:46 AM

•*Smiles* · Selwyn · 6/22/2001, 3:48 PM

•Corrections and "Objections" (sorta) · Phyllis · 6/22/2001, 11:01 PM

•Thanks Phyllis · Selwyn · 6/28/2001, 5:42 PM

•A Note on the offer · Selwyn · 6/15/2001, 7:11 PM

View Message

Messages