New Post
Search
Help[Opinions] I wasn't talking to you . . . (edited)
in reply to a message by Auriel
And I don't appreciate the rude tone of your post.
If you thought you were being unfairly targeted, you could easily have made a polite comment expressing the fact that you thought I was mistaken. There is no excuse for sounding pouty and bad-mannered.
A quick check of the list of names would also have shown you that you had nothing to do with the matter.
If you thought you were being unfairly targeted, you could easily have made a polite comment expressing the fact that you thought I was mistaken. There is no excuse for sounding pouty and bad-mannered.
A quick check of the list of names would also have shown you that you had nothing to do with the matter.
This message was edited 2/16/2007, 2:27 AM
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
*mumbles*
A "quick" check could easily confuse Auriel, her name, with the Ariel listed . . . It's a fair enough reply; she thought she was being wrongly accused. You need to calm down; everyone is not out to get you, but you're sure acting like it lately. I know you have a lot going on, but you're the one being bad mannered more and more frequently.
A "quick" check could easily confuse Auriel, her name, with the Ariel listed . . . It's a fair enough reply; she thought she was being wrongly accused. You need to calm down; everyone is not out to get you, but you're sure acting like it lately. I know you have a lot going on, but you're the one being bad mannered more and more frequently.
1