Names
Introduction
Browse Place Names
Advanced Search
Namesakes
Submitted Place Names
Interact
Message Boards
Submit a Name
Tools
First Name Site
Surname Site
Menu
Sign In
Register
First Name Site
Surname Site
Introduction
Browse Place Names
Advanced Search
Namesakes
Submitted Place Names
Message Boards
Submit a Name
Sign In
Register
View Message
Home
»
Message Boards
»
All Messages
◄
Prev
►
Next
New Post
Search
Any time
Advanced
Help
[Facts] Re: Germanic name suffix not noted (archaic) ?
by
Mike C
6/11/2002, 2:39 AM
in reply to
a message by John Hausmann
The -us suffix is meant to make the names look more "Latin". Baptismal records might list the name as Wilhelmus or Henricus but he would have likely used
Wilhelm
or
Henrik
in everyday conversation.
Reply
1
Messages
Compact replies
▾
full-text
compact
Newest first
▾
newest
active
votes
oldest
Germanic name suffix not noted (archaic) ?
·
John Hausmann
·
6/10/2002, 9:07 PM
•
Re: Germanic name suffix not noted (archaic) ?
·
Mike C
·
6/11/2002, 2:39 AM
•
Re: Germanic name suffix not noted (archaic) ?
·
Barb
·
6/11/2002, 8:49 PM