Message: "Maybe teenagers were less sex-obsessed then?"

[Opinions] Maybe teenagers were less sex-obsessed then?

by Ylva

7/15/2005, 7:23 AM

Or the word "suck" did not have the same associations as now. I doubt that her parents would have named her that if they knew.

I was thinking that the was perhaps too sweet, the "such" thing never entered my mind.

WDYT of Honeysuckle? · Ylva · 7/14/2005, 4:11 PM

•I know someone named Honeysuckle! (m) · Isla · 7/15/2005, 3:03 PM

•Re: WDYT of Honeysuckle? · KatjaKai · 7/15/2005, 8:21 AM

•Re: WDYT of Honeysuckle? · Elinor · 7/15/2005, 3:29 AM

•Maybe teenagers were less sex-obsessed then? · Ylva · 7/15/2005, 7:23 AM

•Not likely . . . · Chrisell · 7/15/2005, 8:47 AM

•Exactly. It's biology-based. nt · Miranda · 7/15/2005, 1:53 PM

•Re: Exactly. It's biology-based. nt · Elinor · 7/15/2005, 3:42 PM

•Re: WDYT of Honeysuckle? · Lissa Hannah · 7/14/2005, 6:31 PM

•Re: WDYT of Honeysuckle? · Seda* · 7/14/2005, 5:58 PM

•Re: WDYT of Honeysuckle? · Schezar · 7/14/2005, 4:26 PM

•Re: WDYT of Honeysuckle? · tor · 7/14/2005, 4:23 PM

•A name does not predict the profession · Ylva · 7/15/2005, 7:20 AM

•Studies have shown . . . · Chrisell · 7/15/2005, 8:45 AM

•It DOES make Honey sound like a good alternative. · Eilis Caitriona · 7/14/2005, 4:27 PM

•Re: WDYT of Honeysuckle? · shantastic · 7/14/2005, 4:16 PM

•Re: WDYT of Honeysuckle? · Alena · 7/14/2005, 4:15 PM

View Message