Message: "Re: What?" - Behind the Name

[Opinions] Re: What?

by Tuesday (trayc53)

10/13/2007, 7:47 PM

Until he/she posts an apology and a sincere promise not to spam the board again, there's absolutely no reason to assume that he/she is going to stop.

Really? I've noticed that people get, erm, agitated when rule-breakers make apology posts. Doesn't it just waste more unnecessary board space?

Messages

SIBSET(L) · jmb171993 · 10/13/2007, 5:47 PM

•Re: SIBSET(L) · YMPvt · 10/14/2007, 4:00 PM

•Re: SIBSET(L) · Mel · 10/13/2007, 7:35 PM

•Re: SIBSET(L) · Pink Princess · 10/13/2007, 6:06 PM

•Re: SIBSET(L) · Dot · 10/13/2007, 5:55 PM

•Please read the rules. (m) · Cera · 10/13/2007, 5:54 PM

•Oh lighten up, everyone (m) · Mel · 10/13/2007, 7:18 PM

•What? · Chrisell · 10/13/2007, 7:37 PM

•Re: What? · Tuesday · 10/13/2007, 7:47 PM

•Re: What? · Chrisell · 10/13/2007, 7:53 PM

•Oh, sorry. I understand what you meant now. nt · Tuesday · 10/13/2007, 7:59 PM

•No probs :-) nt · Chrisell · 10/13/2007, 8:04 PM

•Re: What? · Mel · 10/13/2007, 7:45 PM

•Re: What? · Chrisell · 10/13/2007, 8:03 PM

•Re: What? · Mel · 10/13/2007, 8:11 PM

•Re: What? · Chrisell · 10/13/2007, 8:16 PM

•Re: What? · Mel · 10/13/2007, 8:21 PM

•It's just so she knows the rules for the future. (m) · Tuesday · 10/13/2007, 7:37 PM

•Plus, Isn't this a game? Wouldn't it be better on the games board? n/t · Lizzie_Jay · 10/13/2007, 6:10 PM

•Game? (m) · LMS · 10/13/2007, 6:33 PM

•Yep, it's a game, and yes, the OP is totally out out of line. nt · Chrisell · 10/13/2007, 7:13 PM

•Also, it could have been consolidated into one post. (nt) · Dot · 10/13/2007, 7:10 PM

•Re: Also, it could have been consolidated into one post. (nt) · LMS · 10/13/2007, 7:41 PM

•Whoops, didn't see that you'd already mentioned it. Sorry! (nt) · Dot · 10/13/2007, 7:45 PM

•Re: SIBSET(L) · LMS · 10/13/2007, 5:49 PM

•Re: SIBSET(L) · PBnj813 · 10/14/2007, 6:51 PM

View Message

Messages