[Opinions] Re: What?
I'm not "siding" with the OP. I just think it's totally redundant that this is a post about names and less than 1/4 of the replies are related to the topic. The vast majority is people complaining about jmb. We get it. You're annoyed. Point made.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Messages

SIBSET(L)  ·  jmb171993  ·  10/13/2007, 5:47 PM
Re: SIBSET(L)  ·  YMPvt  ·  10/14/2007, 4:00 PM
Re: SIBSET(L)  ·  Mel  ·  10/13/2007, 7:35 PM
Re: SIBSET(L)  ·  Pink Princess  ·  10/13/2007, 6:06 PM
Re: SIBSET(L)  ·  Dot  ·  10/13/2007, 5:55 PM
Please read the rules. (m)  ·  Cera  ·  10/13/2007, 5:54 PM
Oh lighten up, everyone (m)  ·  Mel  ·  10/13/2007, 7:18 PM
What?  ·  Chrisell  ·  10/13/2007, 7:37 PM
Re: What?  ·  Tuesday  ·  10/13/2007, 7:47 PM
Re: What?  ·  Chrisell  ·  10/13/2007, 7:53 PM
Oh, sorry. I understand what you meant now. nt  ·  Tuesday  ·  10/13/2007, 7:59 PM
No probs :-) nt  ·  Chrisell  ·  10/13/2007, 8:04 PM
Re: What?  ·  Mel  ·  10/13/2007, 7:45 PM
Re: What?  ·  Chrisell  ·  10/13/2007, 8:03 PM
Re: What?  ·  Mel  ·  10/13/2007, 8:11 PM
Re: What?  ·  Chrisell  ·  10/13/2007, 8:16 PM
Re: What?  ·  Mel  ·  10/13/2007, 8:21 PM
It's just so she knows the rules for the future. (m)  ·  Tuesday  ·  10/13/2007, 7:37 PM
Plus, Isn't this a game? Wouldn't it be better on the games board? n/t  ·  Lizzie_Jay  ·  10/13/2007, 6:10 PM
Game? (m)  ·  LMS  ·  10/13/2007, 6:33 PM
Yep, it's a game, and yes, the OP is totally out out of line. nt  ·  Chrisell  ·  10/13/2007, 7:13 PM
Also, it could have been consolidated into one post. (nt)  ·  Dot  ·  10/13/2007, 7:10 PM
Re: Also, it could have been consolidated into one post. (nt)  ·  LMS  ·  10/13/2007, 7:41 PM
Whoops, didn't see that you'd already mentioned it. Sorry! (nt)  ·  Dot  ·  10/13/2007, 7:45 PM
Re: SIBSET(L)  ·  LMS  ·  10/13/2007, 5:49 PM
Re: SIBSET(L)  ·  PBnj813  ·  10/14/2007, 6:51 PM