View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Lovely, but too "Little Rascal" ish. (nt)
nt

This message was edited 3/12/2008, 5:40 PM

Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

For me, it's one-half Little Rascals......and one-half Buffy the Vampire Slayer/Angel. The second moreso than the first.It sickly-sweet feminine to me, but evil, too (because of the latter association). I'm not sure how many people will think of the same characters, though.
vote up1
Yep, I'm half-and-half on that one, too (though it does make me think of a vampire first, lol).
vote up1
Hi there, Sorry, but I don't really know what you mean by 'Little Rascal' -ish. Could you elaborate? Thanks x
vote up1
Thank you dear, I think you've helped my point.
vote up1
One out of how many?I bet if I walked down my hallway at my dorm and asked people what they thought of Darla half would do Buffy or Angel, the other half would do Little Rascals. Either way not a good name, not to mention it just screams slut and white-trash to me.
vote up1
Seriously?I'm very surprised. I wouldn't think many people in the real world even know what that reference is to, much less would think of it when they heard the name Darla.
vote up1
The movie came out when I was a kidAnd was insanely popular, so I'm not at all surprised. Original TV, yes. Movie, not so much.
vote up1
Yes, seriously.That's my 1st association, also. In fact, I can't even think of the name w/o these lines from the re-make coming to mind:"Dear Darla,I hate your stinkin' guts..."
Poor Darla! It's really a sweet name, too. :o/

This message was edited 3/13/2008, 7:23 AM

vote up1