Names
Introduction
Browse Place Names
Advanced Search
Namesakes
Submitted Place Names
Interact
Message Boards
Submit a Name
Tools
First Name Site
Surname Site
Menu
Sign In
Register
First Name Site
Surname Site
Introduction
Browse Place Names
Advanced Search
Namesakes
Submitted Place Names
Message Boards
Submit a Name
Sign In
Register
View Message
Home
»
Message Boards
»
Tag Search
New Post
Search
Any time
Advanced
Help
This is a reply within a larger thread:
view the whole thread
[Opinions] Re: Rachel, Rahel, Raquel....
by
Andromache
(Hannah Ruth)
10/11/2008, 3:23 PM
in reply to
a message by Alienor
Rachel
is ok, but overused, dated and boring in my opinion. I find
Raquel
a little trashy for some reason, and the rest ugly.
I prefer
Noa
Theresa
.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
Full-text replies
▾
full-text
compact
Newest first
▾
newest
active
votes
oldest
-
Serel Channah
(floppery)
+2
10/11/2008, 3:56 PM
Dated?
I don't see how
Rachel
is dated. I mean, it's been in the top 100 since the 70s, and has never left the top 200. When's it dated to?
1
-
Andromache
(Hannah Ruth)
10/11/2008, 6:08 PM
I think it is in the UK at least.
1
-
lac
(guest)
10/11/2008, 5:06 PM
I agree.
Rachel
is timeless. I don't associate it with any particular decade.
1