[Facts] Re: Q about Social Security data
The first year I find any children listed as "Baby" is 1968, so I would assume that most applications prior to 1968 were not made at birth. However, "Unknown" appears every year and reached a peak in the 1950s when five or six hundred girls and a roughly equal number of boys every year are listed as Unknown. Any ideas on why so many people would have a first name missing, when it's not that their parents hadn't yet decided on a name? Perhaps they put only a first initial, which wasn't accepted by the SSA, so "Unknown" was substituted?

This message was edited 1/10/2011, 3:04 PM

vote up1vote down

Messages

Q about Social Security data  ·  ClaudiaS  ·  1/2/2011, 7:38 PM
Re: Q about Social Security data  ·  Elle  ·  1/10/2011, 7:54 PM
Re: Q about Social Security data  ·  Telfalathiel  ·  1/3/2011, 7:05 PM
Re: Q about Social Security data  ·  Cleveland Kent Evans  ·  1/3/2011, 3:11 PM
Re: Q about Social Security data  ·  ClaudiaS  ·  1/10/2011, 3:04 PM
Re: Q about Social Security data  ·  gigibee  ·  1/26/2011, 9:33 AM
Re: Q about Social Security data  ·  SugarPlumFairy  ·  1/3/2011, 7:11 AM