Message: "Re: Warhol?" - Behind the Name

[Opinions] Re: Warhol?

by Laurie (guest)

1/23/2006, 9:55 AM

Sorry, I don't find David at all boring and of all the options, I think it's the best of the lot if you want to honor David Bowie. It seems a stretch to use "Warhol" to honor Bowie and have nothing to do with Andy Warhol. People will always assume it's for A.W. and if you try to explain how it honors Bowie people will just find it confusing.

Messages

Warhol? · Array · 1/22/2006, 8:01 PM

•Re: Warhol? · Laurie · 1/23/2006, 9:55 AM

•Re: Warhol? · Array · 1/23/2006, 10:33 AM

•Re: Warhol? · Belldandy · 1/23/2006, 5:05 AM

•Re: Warhol? · Array · 1/23/2006, 7:09 AM

•Re: Warhol? · Belldandy · 1/23/2006, 7:37 AM

•Re: Warhol? · Elphi · 1/23/2006, 1:19 AM

•Re: Warhol? · Array · 1/23/2006, 7:07 AM

•explanations · Elphi · 1/23/2006, 4:17 PM

•Re: Warhol? · Chrisell · 1/22/2006, 9:54 PM

•Re: Warhol? · Array · 1/23/2006, 6:58 AM

•Re: Warhol? · AlbionGal · 1/22/2006, 8:56 PM

•Re: Warhol? · Array · 1/22/2006, 9:09 PM

•Re: Warhol? · gypsy · 1/22/2006, 8:39 PM

•Re: Warhol? · Array · 1/22/2006, 9:10 PM

•Re: Warhol? · elmh23 · 1/22/2006, 8:19 PM

•Re: Warhol? · Array · 1/22/2006, 8:28 PM

View Message

Messages