[Opinions] Re: No (m)
in reply to a message by Tiggs
It's called the cot-caught merger: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonological_history_of_English_low_back_vowels#Cot.E2.80.93caught_mergerThey sound identical to me, too, which makes sense since I'm from the western US.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Messages

Dante  ·  overtheclouds  ·  2/5/2013, 11:03 AM
Re: Dante  ·  Millie  ·  2/6/2013, 2:38 AM
Re: Dante  ·  Violet  ·  2/5/2013, 8:04 PM
Re: Dante  ·  mirfak  ·  2/5/2013, 6:52 PM
Re: Dante  ·  Calla  ·  2/5/2013, 12:26 PM
Re: Dante  ·  overtheclouds  ·  2/5/2013, 12:31 PM
No (m)  ·  Calla  ·  2/5/2013, 6:02 PM
Re: No (m)  ·  Tiggs  ·  2/6/2013, 1:53 PM
Re: No (m)  ·  Calla  ·  2/6/2013, 3:17 PM
Re: No (m)  ·  Flute  ·  2/6/2013, 2:11 PM
Interesting...  ·  Tiggs  ·  2/6/2013, 9:28 PM
Re: No (m)  ·  Calla  ·  2/6/2013, 3:27 PM
Re: No (m)  ·  M'Quve's Vase  ·  2/6/2013, 1:28 PM
Re: No (m)  ·  Calla  ·  2/6/2013, 3:15 PM
Re: Dante  ·  lovewn  ·  2/5/2013, 12:51 PM
No, it isn't (m)  ·  Calla  ·  2/5/2013, 6:04 PM
Re: No, it isn't (m)  ·  Ludwig  ·  2/6/2013, 2:09 PM
Re: No, it isn't (m)  ·  Calla  ·  2/6/2013, 3:13 PM
Re: No, it isn't (m)  ·  Ludwig  ·  2/6/2013, 4:13 PM
Re: No, it isn't (m)  ·  Calla  ·  2/6/2013, 8:19 PM
I totally agree (m)  ·  Phoebe  ·  2/6/2013, 2:53 PM
Re: I totally agree (m)  ·  Calla  ·  2/6/2013, 3:14 PM
Re: No, it isn't (m)  ·  Ismene  ·  2/6/2013, 7:54 AM
Re: No, it isn't (m)  ·  Calla  ·  2/6/2013, 3:11 PM
Re: Dante  ·  Mar  ·  2/5/2013, 11:29 AM