I'm surprised so many people think
Agatha is less ugly than
Dorothy!
Dorothy sounds more like
Isidora and
Xanthe ... and has no negative sound-associations for me. It's frumpy and antique, Wizard of
Oz, but not ugly IMO.
Dot sounds hipster. But, D-names are "out."
Agatha is as matronly and slightly more regal (A.
Christie) but when I hear the Aga- I expect it to be followed by -ny or -nizing. Apparently this isn't an association everyone makes but for me it ruins the name completely and makes it seem ugly.
Even Aggie pings my "agony" neurons. Aggression, agrarian, aggravating... nothing pleasant about it for me. Agh Guh Thuh. It's too bad, because the name
Agatha should be appealing, based on its dignified past.
And
Aggie also sounds like, you know, the Aggies ... alumni/students of any "ag" university? In particular Texas A&M - but I lived in
Austin for a long time, so maybe that's just a regional association. A girl called
Aggie in
Austin would be assumed to be a reference.
Agata seems neater and younger to me, I'm not noticing the Agg as much in that and it makes me think of agate jewelry.
I agree with those who said
Dorothy may see a little usage but
Agatha not very much.
- mirfakThis message was edited 4/12/2017, 2:40 PM