View Message

To be honest, I do get sense impressions from female names more than I do male names. It's just that my sense impressions are usually not negative. Usually. However, there is my oft-used Charlotte impression: "Short, frizzy mousy brown hair, thick glasses, orthopedic shoes, never been kissed." So when have we seen a male name described as lacking in height, unattractive hair, poor eyesight, bad feet, and virginal-through-lack of opportunity? I've done it too!

---

Obviously what I find worthy of condemnation in a female is lack of grooming, lack of a fun-loving personality, and lack of male companionship, rather than the opposite, which is the only difference between my Charlotte description and what I put in my first post.