New Post
Search
Help[Opinions] Re: Themistoclea
in reply to a message by Pelops
Idk, Law and Glory do not seem aesthetically compatible concepts to me. They're so ugly together. Unyielding and glaring. Self-righteous, on average.
Laws are necessary evils. I do like having them but not when they're glorified.
I guess the most charitable way I could think of it is 'splendidness of proper proportions and natural forces'...which still seems a little priggish.
Or 'equality and order as a manifestation of the divine' doesn't seem too bad, but I don't think that'd be an honest rendering of custom and law, as concepts IRL.
I don't hate it. I mostly just feel suspicious of it. Maybe because I'm left-handed, who knows.
Laws are necessary evils. I do like having them but not when they're glorified.
I guess the most charitable way I could think of it is 'splendidness of proper proportions and natural forces'...which still seems a little priggish.
Or 'equality and order as a manifestation of the divine' doesn't seem too bad, but I don't think that'd be an honest rendering of custom and law, as concepts IRL.
I don't hate it. I mostly just feel suspicious of it. Maybe because I'm left-handed, who knows.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
Oh! To me natural law is the only way existence is able to manifest and do anything. Cles of themis is glory in the things about the world that make creation and some sense of predictability possible. It's a celebration of being here! But I am cap moon
1
hm, well maybe as a pisces moon, I would rather nurture chaos than celebrate order.
1