View Message

Priscilla

I think they would be fun together. Priscilla is conventional and Lark makes it pop.

---

I'd rather be Lark than Priscilla, if forced to pick.

---

I like/dislike them about equally. They both have their merits, but it's a little easier for me to appreciate Prisca and Meadowlark or Larkin. And I'd probably pick Prisca, out of those; the hard C improves it a lot imo.

This message was edited 1/9/2022, 11:48 AM

Priscilla. I'm not much fond of it but I absolutely detest Lark. It's very unattractive and unappealing and that's putting it mildly. It doesn't even sound like an actual name. Just something pulled out of thin air, inspired by a species of birds who were poorly saddled with it.

They’re completely different from one another. Priscilla is frilly and…prissy and Lark is short, blunt, and frankly, kind of unattractive. I think I’d go with Lark anyway though, Priscilla’s just a bit too much for me.

Definitely Priscilla. No contest ... it's a name, with a good, long history and it was never popular enough to be dated. Larks are probably pleasant little birds, but that's no excuse: Lark doesn't work as a given name, rhyming as it does with bark, and that's before you consider the prospect of larking around.

Lark. It’s short, spunky, natural. Priscilla is prissy, over the top and artificial.

Priscilla.

---

Lark is too nature-sounding and simple to me.

Priscilla.

Lark, I guess.

Lark

---

I loved the actress Lark Voorhies when I was younger.

I prefer Lark. Priscilla sounds... prissy to me.

---

*