[Opinions] Re: Godswill
in reply to a message by Gaia
The "swill" part overpowers the God bit for me, or turns it into "God Swill" - it's so unpleasant it feels sacrilegious rather than pious. Like the name of a death metal band (or black metal? I can't remember which ones like using "satanic" imagery).
Replies
This, it just looks and sounds like "God Swill". (Are you thinking of Godsmack maybe? Not death metal or black metal, but kind of a similar band name).
If we were all illiterate, and the name was just the sound "godz-wil", then it would come across as "God's Will". But since we can read and the name is a set of letters to us, we see "God Swill".
If we were all illiterate, and the name was just the sound "godz-wil", then it would come across as "God's Will". But since we can read and the name is a set of letters to us, we see "God Swill".
I don't think illiteracy would make much difference in my case. I read it correctly, and then the swill part stood out to me when I thought of saying/hearing it. I feel it's more like whether able to read it or not, if I heard it directly in reference to a person, the swill association would seem less immediate.
This message was edited 4/6/2023, 12:09 PM
This is a good point about reading vs. speaking and what we're most used to. I doubt the Puritans were that illiterate since reading their bible was presumably pretty important to them, but they surely did a lot less reading of names, compared to saying them!
I have the "swill" problem with the name Godswill, too.
Lol, now that you mentioned this, if I ever read of Godsmack again I'm going to find myself reading it as "God's mack."
Maybe modern people could spell it Godzwyl - haha that is kinda cool in a way?
I have the "swill" problem with the name Godswill, too.
Lol, now that you mentioned this, if I ever read of Godsmack again I'm going to find myself reading it as "God's mack."
Maybe modern people could spell it Godzwyl - haha that is kinda cool in a way?
This message was edited 4/6/2023, 1:16 AM
Godzwylla?