Names
Introduction
Browse Place Names
Advanced Search
Namesakes
Submitted Place Names
Interact
Message Boards
Submit a Name
Tools
First Name Site
Surname Site
Menu
Sign In
Register
First Name Site
Surname Site
Introduction
Browse Place Names
Advanced Search
Namesakes
Submitted Place Names
Message Boards
Submit a Name
Sign In
Register
View Message
Home
»
Message Boards
»
All Messages
◄
Prev
►
Next
New Post
Search
Any time
Advanced
Help
[Opinions] Why did some names more/less "classic" than the other, even though the peaks were around the same time?
by
Francisinfp5w4
2/27/2024, 3:17 AM
I was bored and was looking at the rankings of girls' names from 1970-1979 and some names felt more classic than others (this has nothing to do with my personal preference). So I asked a question.
This message was edited 2/27/2024, 3:21 AM
Sign In to Reply
2
Messages
Compact replies
▾
full-text
compact
Newest first
▾
newest
active
votes
oldest
Why did some names more/less "classic" than the other, even though the peaks were around the same time?
·
Francisinfp5w4
·
2/27/2024, 3:17 AM
•
Re: Why did some names more/less "classic" than the other, even though the peaks were around the same time?
·
New_Chloë
·
2/27/2024, 5:23 AM
•
Re: Why did some names more/less "classic" than the other, even though the peaks were around the same time?
·
Francisinfp5w4
·
2/27/2024, 5:31 AM
•
Re: Why did some names more/less "classic" than the other, even though the peaks were around the same time?
·
Amphelise
·
2/27/2024, 3:57 AM
•
Re: Why did some names more/less "classic" than the other, even though the peaks were around the same time?
·
Francisinfp5w4
·
2/27/2024, 4:25 AM
•
Re: Why did some names more/less "classic" than the other, even though the peaks were around the same time?
·
Dianatiger
·
2/27/2024, 8:37 AM
•
Re: Why did some names more/less "classic" than the other, even though the peaks were around the same time?
·
Dianatiger
·
2/27/2024, 8:34 AM