View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Re: Is "cull" the same as "kill"?
I never heard anything more terrible in my life. Killing innocent animals because WE think there are too many. That's sick.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Um . . .We think there are too many because they don't have enough food for their numbers, so the ones that miss out on the available normal prey attack and sometimes kill small children because they're hungry. Would you prefer us to feed them children than cull them?Culls of other animals have also occurred where the animals had insufficient resources. If you've got 10,000 kangaroos and you *know* 4,000 of them are going to starve to death, it's a pretty horrible sight to just let them starve. Better to humanely cull them than wait for them to die.
~Chrisell~ Proudly Australian www.archaeochrisell.blogspot.com

This message was edited 10/29/2006, 2:25 PM

vote up1
why WE would think thatThere are also animals that are brought by humans to a foreign country (like Australia when the first settlers came), they ran out in the wild and the problem was that they didn't have natural enemies, so they disrupted the balance in the ecosystem. Then these animals were controlled by humans by killing them when they become to numerous. Then it becomes a matterof people cleaning up their own mess. Personally, I don't like it (I'd prefer sterilisation of some other measures).Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

This message was edited 10/29/2006, 8:31 AM

vote up1