[Facts] Re: New article
Interesting article, with lots of great examples. However, it boils down to one guy's obviously emotional judgment. Although it's an informed opinion, I hear the same old middle class horror, hardly scholarly analysis, and only moderately informative (for me anyway). I'll elaborate why I think so, if anyone cares.. but this is the facts board :-) I'm still keeping an eye out for a more thoughtful, objective analysis of the trend in its historical context.I wonder if you can get ABCNews's permission to link or reprint this article on the site: http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=124232&page=1Thanks for the article. - chazda
vote up1vote down

Messages

New article  ·  Mike C  ·  10/18/2004, 1:27 PM
Condi's wacky name never hurt her career...  ·  Pavlos  ·  10/19/2004, 3:06 AM
La'Nokia? Pleeease tell me you're kidding! nt  ·  Chrisell  ·  10/19/2004, 3:15 AM
Re: La'Nokia? Pleeease tell me you're kidding! nt  ·  Anneza  ·  10/19/2004, 5:50 AM
Re: New article  ·  Anneza  ·  10/19/2004, 1:33 AM
Re: New article  ·  chazda  ·  10/18/2004, 8:09 PM
more on same article topic (?)  ·  chazda  ·  10/18/2004, 10:36 PM
Re: more on same article topic (?)  ·  Chrisell  ·  10/18/2004, 10:50 PM
Re: more on same article topic (?) - edited  ·  chazda  ·  10/18/2004, 11:12 PM
Re: more on same article topic (?) - edited  ·  Chrisell  ·  10/19/2004, 12:28 AM
Re: more on same article topic (?) - edited  ·  chazda  ·  10/19/2004, 7:39 AM
Re: more on same article topic (?) - edited  ·  Miss Claire  ·  10/19/2004, 9:48 AM
Re: more on same article topic (?) - edited  ·  chazda  ·  10/19/2004, 4:36 PM
Re: more on same article topic (?) - edited  ·  Chrisell  ·  10/19/2004, 6:40 PM
Re: more on same article topic (?) - edited  ·  chazda  ·  10/19/2004, 8:58 PM
Re: New article  ·  Lala  ·  10/18/2004, 4:11 PM