Message: "Re: more on same article topic (?) - edited"

[Facts] Re: more on same article topic (?) - edited

by chazda

10/18/2004, 11:12 PM

Yes, right, that's what I was trying (struggling?) to say... And the main thing was, that they have some hard data to support this conclusion.

Of course it's the 'politically correct' conclusion, but that other conclusion cries out for hard support, while its proponents provide none (the resume/interview study does not make any analysis, it's just provocative).

- chazda

This message was edited 10/18/2004, 11:20 PM

Messages

New article · Mike C · 10/18/2004, 1:27 PM

•Condi's wacky name never hurt her career... · Pavlos · 10/19/2004, 3:06 AM

•La'Nokia? Pleeease tell me you're kidding! nt · Chrisell · 10/19/2004, 3:15 AM

•Re: La'Nokia? Pleeease tell me you're kidding! nt · Anneza · 10/19/2004, 5:50 AM

•Re: New article · Anneza · 10/19/2004, 1:33 AM

•Re: New article · chazda · 10/18/2004, 8:09 PM

•more on same article topic (?) · chazda · 10/18/2004, 10:36 PM

•Re: more on same article topic (?) · Chrisell · 10/18/2004, 10:50 PM

•Re: more on same article topic (?) - edited · chazda · 10/18/2004, 11:12 PM

•Re: more on same article topic (?) - edited · Chrisell · 10/19/2004, 12:28 AM

•Re: more on same article topic (?) - edited · chazda · 10/19/2004, 7:39 AM

•Re: more on same article topic (?) - edited · Miss Claire · 10/19/2004, 9:48 AM

•Re: more on same article topic (?) - edited · chazda · 10/19/2004, 4:36 PM

•Re: more on same article topic (?) - edited · Chrisell · 10/19/2004, 6:40 PM

•Re: more on same article topic (?) - edited · chazda · 10/19/2004, 8:58 PM

•Re: New article · Lala · 10/18/2004, 4:11 PM

View Message

Messages